OPINION: What air accident statistics don’t tell us
08 January, 2016
BY: Flight International
With 2015 having proven – at least conditionally – to be the safest year on record for airline passenger transport operations, the inquiry into the Tatarstan 737 crash at Kazan is a reminder that such statistics are, to some extent, still dependent on good fortune.
Investigators frequently use the ‘Swiss cheese’ model to illustrate the manner in which weak elements can line up to cause an accident. But when the nature of an airline’s operation turns out to have been more hole than cheese, this model becomes practically redundant.
If the revelation that a carrier’s pilots can find themselves attempting to correct a gross position error on approach before catastrophically bodging a go-around after failing to understand their aircraft’s behaviour isn’t sufficiently disturbing, the extraordinary attempt to deflect attention by suggesting a possible mechanical problem, despite the lack of evidence, might be.
The mystery of this accident is less about why it happened than why it had not occurred sooner.
But had the crew at Kazan managed to recover the aircraft, the incident would have been ignored by statistics that focus on hull losses and casualties.
Which is why the improvement in safety figures for 2015 ought to be viewed in an honest context. The absence of an aluminium shower, while infinitely preferable to the alternative, is not the truest mark of a safe air transport system.
Flightglobal.com


Agroecology Week Targets Stronger links Between Farmers, Policy and Markets
Stanbic Commits UGX20m to Virunga Gorilla Marathon’s Conservation Drive
Energy Ministry and Equity Bank target lower hotel energy costs through green investment initiative
FAA Certifies Boeing 737-10, Clearing Path for Deliveries of Largest 737 MAX Variant
Aviation Industry Coalition Presses EU to Protect Voluntary use of Biometric Travel Technology
Somalia Recognises IATA Safety Audits in Push for Common African Aviation Standards